As the Ayer Kuning by-election approaches, much of the mainstream narrative dismisses the potential of the Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)-Muda alliance. Analysts predict a poor showing, arguing that these smaller parties cannot compete with the three dominant coalitions – Pakatan Harapan (PH), Barisan Nasional (BN), and Perikatan Nasional (PN).

However, these assertions overlook key factors that make the PSM-Muda candidacy not only relevant but also a necessary counterbalance to the prevailing political landscape.

One of the most compelling reasons for supporting the PSM-Muda alliance is the opportunity to disrupt the status quo. The argument that West Malaysian voters will only support PH, BN, or PN assumes that the electorate is content with these coalitions despite growing dissatisfaction with their performance.

In reality, many voters are disenchanted by the repetitive cycle of political power-sharing and broken promises.

PSM and Muda offer a fresh perspective that challenges the entrenched interests of the major coalitions. PSM’s long-standing commitment to workers’ rights, social welfare, and grassroots advocacy, combined with Muda’s youthful energy and focus on transparency, is a unique combination that resonates with voters seeking meaningful change. Dismissing their candidacy as irrelevant fails to acknowledge the rising public demand for alternatives beyond the mainstream.

While some analysts argue that PSM’s socialist policies only appeal to urban voters, this view oversimplifies the socio-economic realities in constituencies like Ayer Kuning.

Rural and semi-urban areas are not immune to the economic challenges that are being addressed on socialist platforms. Issues like job insecurity, rising living costs, and access to basic services are concerns that affect all Malaysians, regardless of geography.

PSM’s consistent advocacy for universal healthcare, fair wages, and stronger labour protection directly addresses the concerns of working-class voters. Moreover, Muda’s focus on systemic reform and youth engagement speaks to a demographic that is often overlooked by traditional parties. Together, these platforms provide tangible solutions to the everyday struggles faced by voters in Ayer Kuning.

The claim that PSM-Muda cannot secure more than 1,000 votes overlooks the shifting dynamics of Malaysian politics. Voter behaviour is not static, and political winds can change rapidly when voters are presented with credible, values-driven candidates.

While it is true that PSM received fewer than 1,000 votes in Ayer Kuning in 2022, this figure does not account for the evolving political sentiment post-pandemic, nor does it reflect the potential boost from Muda’s endorsement.

Moreover, smaller parties have historically faced structural disadvantages, including limited media coverage and financial resources. Despite these challenges, PSM has earned a reputation as a principled party that prioritises the needs of ordinary Malaysians.

When combined with Muda’s ability to engage younger voters and leverage digital platforms, the alliance has the potential to surpass expectations.

A suggestion has been made that PSM is targeting Ayer Kuning due to its sizeable Indian electorate. While it is true that ethnic demographics play a role in Malaysian politics, reducing PSM’s motivations to racial calculations is both unfair and inaccurate. PSM’s track record demonstrates a commitment to class solidarity over ethnic division. Its policies benefit all Malaysians, regardless of race or religion.

The alliance with Muda further underscores this non-racial approach. Muda has consistently rejected race-based politics in favour of a multi-ethnic vision for Malaysia. At a time when ethno-religious narratives dominate political discourse, the PSM-Muda partnership provides a refreshing and necessary shift toward a politics rooted in shared economic struggles and collective solutions.

Rather than viewing the by-election as an exercise in futility, PSM and Muda are playing the long game. Contesting Ayer Kuning is an opportunity to test the viability of their partnership and refine their electoral strategy ahead of future general elections. It is a calculated effort to expand their presence and build a stronger foundation for future contests.

Furthermore, dismissing their prospects based on past performance ignores the broader political climate. Many Malaysians, particularly younger voters, are frustrated by the lack of meaningful reform. The PSM-Muda alliance represents a beacon of hope for those seeking a more inclusive and accountable government. With sustained outreach and grassroots organising, their influence will only grow over time.

The dominance of PH, BN, and PN has created a political landscape where genuine reform is often sidelined by power struggles. Smaller parties like PSM and Muda provide a vital check against this monopoly. By contesting elections and amplifying alternative voices, they push the national conversation toward policies that prioritise social justice and equity.

Additionally, the argument that smaller parties should align with major coalitions to remain relevant undermines the value of independent platforms. In many established democracies, smaller parties play a critical role in shaping policy and holding larger parties accountable. Malaysia stands to benefit from a more pluralistic political landscape where diverse voices are given space to thrive.

The Ayer Kuning by-election is more than just a local contest; it is a test of whether Malaysian democracy can accommodate diverse political visions. The PSM-Muda alliance may face an uphill battle, but its candidacy represents a bold attempt to challenge the status quo and advocate policies that serve the many, not just the elite.

Rather than dismissing PSM and Muda as irrelevant, the public should recognise their candidacy as an essential part of a broader movement towards a more equitable and inclusive Malaysia.

Voters in Ayer Kuning have a rare opportunity to break away from the entrenched political order and support a coalition that genuinely prioritises people over power. The question is not whether PSM-Muda can win this election, but whether Malaysians are ready to embrace the possibility of real change.

Wan Zamzahidi Wan Zahid is Pahang PSM chief.

The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.

---

Wan Zamzahidi Wan Zahid

Click here to subscribe to ESSF newsletters in English and or French.